As the D-MATL Research Integrity Advisor (RIA) I'll be happy to listen to your problem, especially if you are a member of the D-MATL. All to be discussed within a personal communication will remain strictly confidential. I am not in the position to make final decisions, but I can try to ask the right questions and contact, in case you prefer this, the other party, to find out if there is some common interest to solve the problem, or to highlight the principles of good scientific practise. Find below a number of documents that may help you in your assessment of the problem. I speak German (native) and English.
D-MATL Course Catalogue
Research Integrity Culture
- How to blow the whistle and still have a career afterwards
- Culture (summary) (full paper)
- Student responsibilities
- Checklist for researchers
ETH Ethics Commission
- Function and Members
- Responsibility for ethics evaluation
- Instructions for proposal submission
- Reglement der Ethikkommission der ETH Zurich RSETHZ 413 (aktuelle Version, in Überarbeitung)
ETH Reglements and Guidelines
Tip: Program codes written by unemployed students are generally NOT owned by ETH or its research groups. If a code was written within the context of a research project, the group leader should discuss and document the issue of ownership in an early stage of the project.
- Integrity guidelines RSETHZ 414en (german)
- Procedures scientific misconduct RSETHZ 415en (german)
- Reporting inappropriate behavior RSETHZ 615en (german)
- Fair research data (presentation)
Authorship
Tip: At the start of a project, create a shared document (overleaf, google docs), invite potential coauthors, create an initial title and order of authors. All potential coauthors should be able to edit this document that should, in the course of time, develop to a full manuscript (including SI). Overleaf allows to track changes and to discuss the roles (including ordering) of author within this document so that all people working on this project are up-to-date at any time, can share their thoughts at any time, and can make sure that their contribution is tracked and documented. People upon the initial list of authors that do not significantly contribute to the contents of the manuscript, or do not contribute to the writing of the manuscript, should be removed from the list of authors. Each person that was initially on the list should have the chance to argue why he/she should stay on the list.Further reading
- DFG Curriculum for lecture courses
- CH 2021-Swiss-Academies-Code-of-Conduct (german)
- European-Code-of-Conduct
- DFG Leitlinien Sicherung GWP
Internal documents
© 2025![]()